SCARGO is funded by the NSF Office of Polar Programs. The research is led by NSF NCAR in collaboration with NOAA, the Cooperative Institute for Research In Environmental Sciences (CIRES), [C]Worthy, and Earth Sciences New Zealand. The flights are operated by the New York Air National Guard in support of the U.S. Antarctic Program.

New multi‑year awards affirm the need for infrastructure built through [C]Worthy’s approach of marrying open-source science and practical tools for industry use.

As marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) technologies continue to advance, there’s emerging interest in using CO2 from direct ocean capture (DOC) as a feedstock for E-fuels.

Today marks the establishment of a new marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) coalition that brings together a roster of industry leaders who will work on advancing this promising decarbonization field in a responsible and high-integrity manner.

Matt Long, CEO and co-founder of [C]Worthy, told me that he thinks it’s both appropriate and important to start issuing credits for ocean alkalinity enhancement — while also acknowledging that “we have robust reason to believe that we can do a lot better” when it comes to assessing these removals.

“Early progress from the first focused research organizations has strengthened Marblestone’s conviction that they’re filling a gap.

[C]Worthy is the FRO building tools to ensure safe, ocean-based carbon dioxide removal. It recently released an interactive map of alkaline activity to improve our understanding of one method for sequestering carbon known as ocean alkalinity enhancement.”

Today, [C]Worthy launches the Direct Ocean Removal (DOR) Efficiency Map in collaboration with our partners at CarbonPlan.

‘"Large volume for contact is one of the reasons why the ocean presents scalable approaches to carbon dioxide removal," says Matthew Long, an Adjunct Scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in the U.S. Long is the Co-founder and CEO of [C]Worthy, a non-profit that researches marine CDR solutions.’

“Even if these solutions do work long term, most companies are operating on too small of a scale to influence the climate. Expanding to meet current climate goals will take massive amounts of resources, energy and money.”

[C]Worthy cofounder and CTO Alicia Karspeck is interviewed by Yale Climate Connections: “It’s actually a natural process that happens already on very long geologic timescales, and it’s a matter of just accelerating that natural process.”

“This is pretty hard, right?,” University of Hawaii Oceanography Professor David Ho tells Sentient. “If we’re talking about carbon dioxide removal, basically, you’re talking about the largest thing that humanity has ever done.”

‘[Karspeck] said building trust is fundamental to effective markets, “even more the case when you don’t have the government actually creating or mandating that.”’

“It may be surprising that it should take so long to quantify this process, but partly it’s because this is a hard problem to examine,” Ho said.

“[C]Worthy and CarbonPlan believe these tools will support smart decision-making about real-world deployments, and inform ongoing efforts to create scientifically informed standards and effective regulatory frameworks for ocean-based CDR.”

‘“It has to go from something that most people have never heard of to the largest industry the world has ever seen, in a really short time,” said David Ho, an ocean scientist at the University of Hawaii at Manoa.’

“I think carbon removal is a tool for the future,” David Ho, a climate scientist and cofounder of the nonprofit [C]Worthy, told us. ​“Now is the time we figure out what works and what doesn’t work. It’s almost an obligation to future generations to give them tools to remove the CO₂ that we’re leaving them and let them decide whether to deploy these tools or not — it’s not for today.”

“It doesn’t make sense to use CCS to prolong our use of fossil fuels, especially to produce electricity,” said David Ho, professor at University of Hawaii and senior researcher at Columbia University. “The argument in favor of enhanced oil recovery is often that if they weren’t using this captured CO2, they’d be using some other CO2, but I don’t think you can call anything where you’re getting more oil out of the ground to burn a climate solution.”

"We put a tracer, a gas, in the water which has a dual purpose. On the one hand, to examine the gas exchange between the atmosphere and the water, which affects how the sea absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, we want to examine the movement of the water in the fjord to prepare for an experiment that we are aiming for next year."

“People hear chemistry and they don’t like that,” says David Ho, a geochemist and professor of oceanography at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.

“Just remember these are not just companies pushing this forward, these are not just policy objectives – these are entire groups and disciplines of scientists who are coming along on this journey of helping us understand what it means to do these types of interventions in the natural world.”